3 Comments »

The only way we will see a correlation between spending and value is if the parasitic business model of health insurance is removed from the equation. Whether this means a return to pay as you go or going the opposite direction with a Canadian model, is really what the debate should be. All these tax credits and hybrid games of insurance companies working with the government are never going to deliver superior care, because as long as there is an entity in the healthy care process who has a financial stake in denying care and reducing quality of service to bare minimums, the normal free market pressures to improve service and reduce costs will not be allowed to function by that entity.

Wow! A $5,000.00 credit for families that cannot afford to BUY insurance in the first place. This means absolutely nothing to me and my family. This just goes to show how out-of-touch this party has become to its constituents.

This $2500 credit, presumably a tax credit, doesn’t do much for those of us with an income so small that we don’t have to pay much, if any, tax at all, without that credit.

Your comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (Required, not published )

Website

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>