Healthcare Innovations in Disease Management
by Scott MacStravic
3 Comments »
Kevin wrote @ April 18th, 2007 at 10:19 am
DM is currently too broad of a category. There are too many different models involved and key to successful outcomes is usually dependent on behavior changes. Some models will be more effective at others. Does anyone know about different scales or criteria that we could use to analyze outcomes according to differentiated models of DM?
Alberto wrote @ June 8th, 2007 at 5:16 pm
DM is broad but predictive modeling is not. You can take DM and divided into multiple predictive models and these technologies should have a tremendous impact in the healthcare , pharma, and biotech industries.
See: http://atomai.blogspot.com/
Jaan Sidorov wrote @ March 7th, 2008 at 1:17 pm
Excellent discussion above. I’ve linked to it on my blog entry on the latest MedPAC report. That report is astonishingly free of any reference to the developments in the disease management community. Instead it’s all about physicians and payments. As I point out, that’s necessary but not sufficient.
Link here: http://diseasemanagementcareblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/medpac-has-just-released-their.html
Your comment
HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
